I’m currently receiving a record number of   emails from readers eager to state their views on various local issues.

Many are angry at policies they deem to be serving vested interests, others express their dismay at appalling service. Some are apoplectic with rage, writing page upon page of detailed ‘evidence’, and all want their views heard.

I read them all as many have the ring of truth, or at least the kernel of an intriguing theory.

I’m often motivated to follow up until I reach the salutation. Anonymous letters I ignore, those who supply names but insist they remain anonymous I examine more closely. Named letters and emails go to the top of the pile.

In my experience the facts are far more likely to be accurate when the author is prepared to be quoted.

If there is obvious reason for anonymity that’s a different matter – for example serving police officers or NHS staff – that I understand.

What I don’t understand is the expression of deeply held convictions accompanied by some nebulous reason for secrecy.

Credibility is a serious issue if you want publicity for your cause.

Seeking anonymity simply to save (your) embarrassment reduces its perceived validity.

As Bob Marley famously told us, ‘Stand up for your rights’.